Coronavirus ‘did NOT come from animals in Wuhan market’ and was ‘taken in by somebody already carrying the killer bug’

Coronavirus ‘did NOT come from animals in Wuhan market’ and was ‘taken in by someone already carrying the killer bug’

CORONAVIRUS could not have come from a wild animal market in Wuhan, in accordance with the outcomes of a landmark scientific examine.

Because the seek for the origin of Covid-19 continues, biologists have now discovered proof suggesting the virus was “pre-adapted to human transmission”, the Mail on Sunday experiences.

He blamed wet markets in China for causing the coronavirus pandemic
A brand new examine has urged that the coronavirus could not have originated in Wuhan’s moist markets
Getty Photographs – Getty

Biologists have said that "available genetic data does not point to cross-species transmission of the virus at the market"
Alamy Stay Information

Biologists have mentioned that “obtainable genetic information doesn’t level to cross-species transmission of the virus on the market”[/caption]

Biologists Yujia Alina Chan and Benjamin Deverman from the Broad Institute carried out the brand new analysis alongside Shing Hei Zhan from the College of British Columbia.

For his or her examine, they in contrast the genetic samples from Covid-19 sufferers with these from the coronavirus of the 2002-04 SARS epidemic – which was additionally transmitted from bats to people.

They wrote that they have been shocked to search out that the brand new coronavirus “resembles SARSCoV within the late section of the 2003 epidemic”.

However this similarity raised their suspicions, as whereas SARS-CoV had developed because it unfold internationally, the brand new coronavirus arrived in a “extremely infectious” type that appeared “pre-adapted to human transmission”.

Covid-19 appeared “with out peer in late 2019”, they write, “suggesting there was a single introduction of the human-adapted type of the virus into the human inhabitants.”

This led the scientists to conclude that “the publicly obtainable genetic information doesn’t level to cross-species transmission of the virus on the market.”

“The likelihood {that a} non-genetically engineered precursor might have tailored to people whereas being studied in a laboratory must be thought-about”, they added.


The scientists additionally genetically examined 4 samples containing the virus from the animal market to these taken from a affected person in Wuhan in December.

In doing so, they discovered the 2 have been “99.9 per cent similar”, and said this pointed in direction of the speculation that “Sars-CoV-2 had been imported into the market by people”.

However the suggestion that the coronavirus could have originated in a lab has additionally been challenged earlier than by scientists, with the WHO calling the speculation “speculative“.

The publicly obtainable genetic information doesn’t level to cross-species transmission of the virus on the market

Biologists from the Broad Institute, analyzing the origins of coronavirus

And Dr Anthony Fauci, the highest medic main the US coronavirus response, has additionally mentioned he’s “very, very strongly leaning towards the concept” that “this [virus] couldn’t have been artificially or intentionally manipulated.”

However nonetheless, nations internationally have provoked the anger of Beijing by calling for an impartial enquiry into the origins of the virus.

The Chinese language authorities got here beneath hearth for closing the moist market only a day after the WHO have been notified, obstructing efforts to assemble very important samples to share with the worldwide medical group.


The seek for the supply of the virus has turn into extra advanced since US-China relations have soured following President Trump’s declare that the virus originated in a lab.

Mr Trump has repeatedly informed the media he has “proof” that the virus got here from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

However China has responded to those allegations with its personal conspiracy idea asserting that American troopers could have been accountable for the outbreak.

Beijing’s international ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian tweeted on March 12 that it “is likely to be the US military who introduced the epidemic to Wuhan“, prompting a diplomatic stand off with Washington that has lasted for months.

The Chinese language authorities has additionally denied any affiliation between the virus and any of its labs, claiming: “The virus was efficiently remoted from optimistic environmental specimens, suggesting that the virus originated from wild animals offered within the South China Seafood Market.”

It comes because the coronavirus has now killed over 312,000 individuals worldwide.

4.7 million individuals have been contaminated with the illness throughout six continents after it emerged in Wuhan, China on the finish of final yr.

However earlier this week, China claimed it was not conscious of how infectious the virus was till Jan 19, Zeng Yixin, vice minister of the Nationwide Well being Fee, mentioned on Friday.

Workers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)
Staff on the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)

The international community has provoked anger in Beijing for calling an independent enquiry into the outbreak
The worldwide group has provoked anger in Beijing for calling for impartial enquiry into the outbreak
Alamy Stay Information

The coronavirus outbreak began in Wuhan, China at the end of 2019

The coronavirus outbreak started in Wuhan, China and has now unfold throughout six continents[/caption]